Hi all, >> But we would like to ask you to clearly indicate that the profiles are >> only free for non-commercial usage, commercial users need a licence. >> The easiest approach is to add a reference to the SILVA terms of >> license assigned to the software/profile. > Argghh! this will prevent from being in free section. And I suppose > those profiles are mandary for software usage ?
To ensure that the Debian version and the upstream version produce the same results, yes, they are necessary. I guess there are two choices now: 1. Put barrnap in non-free. What consequences would that have for a 'regular' academic user -- they would have to enable non-free on a default install, right? 2. Use an alternative set of pHMMs in the Debian version of barrnap, only including those which are built from Rfam alignments only (Rfam has a free license (CC0)). However, that would strongly limit the functionality of barrnap as whole rRNA families could end up being missing from the output of the dfsg compliant version. I guess to have a usable barrnap version, 1. is the only viable solution. Any comments? Thanks Sascha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
