Hello everybody, I recommend to balance practical availability of development time with more ideal point of views on the design.
Ideally, EDAM data would be pulled from the UDD, and injected to the UDD not only through upstream/metadata files, but also through other sources of information, in particular Debtags, that also include ways to express how two packages can interface. But the easiest way to start is to write EDAM files directly. I do not think that there is a strong conflict here: there is a migration path from one approach to the other. Lastly, as small nitpick: if the EDAM file describes the Debian package as a whole, and not just the software packaged in, then the debian/upstream directory is, at least in aestethically, not the right place to store it. Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
