By the by, while I don't personally have experience with this software the offices of the upstream team are next to mine. Please let me know how I can be of assistance!
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:38 AM Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tim and Steffen, > > you both did some work on the rdp-classifier package in the past. I > think the package underwent some heavy changes upstream. One of the > major changes seems to be that the data dir was stripped which reduced > the size of the download drastically. I changed the packaging to > reflect the recently packaged predependencies. While rdp-readseq is > just in unstable the two other predependencies (rdp-alignment and > librdp-taxonomy-tree-java) are in new. I'd consider this as a good > time to give rdp-classifier in its current state a test to be able > to upload it right after these dependencies might have hit unstable. > > Specifically I would like you to rise your opinion about the naming of > the script. Currently we have rdp_classifier (with '_' == underscore) > while in rdp-readseq and rdp-alignment the scripts in /usr/bin are the > same as the package name (with '-' == dash). I wonder whether we should > rather settle with a consistent naming but I'm not sure about the > consequences for other tools which might use the scripts. > > I would also like to add autopkgtest - possibly running the build time > test suite. However, I have not yet done this for Java packages. Any > volunteer to implement this? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > >
