Dear Andreas, > > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:27:12PM -0400, Gregory Sharp wrote: > > > Could you please explain your motivation to do the package that way? > > > > This was not intentional, therefore an error. Thank you for finding! > > I believe that I could fix by modifying the rules file. > > I noticed that you actually fixed it by modifying d/rules. I added this > change to d/changelog and uploaded. > > In any case I need to say that I have some bad feelings about the code > copy of Lua inside plastimatch and the delivered patches for itk are > something that should be avoided in the long run. I'm just telling you > this as upstream developer - may be you might get some solution for this > in one of your next releases.
So far, I could fix the following issues: - fix regression test failure on i386 - use shared library build for debian package - remove patched version of lua The one I couldn't solve was to remove the patched ITK files. The patch is still relevant for the less popular platforms where ITK4 is not available. Thank you, Greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
