Hi, On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:09:33PM +0800, Xi Yang wrote: > Hi: > >From a packagers point of view it makes sense to use the same name as > >the download archive. If you might continue to maintain htqc1 and htqc2 > >our automatic sentinel that tracks download locations will have touble > >to realise new versions of htqc (version 1) since the htqc2 download > >tarballs seem to be higher. > Would it help if I put HTQC 1 and 2 in separate directories in sourceforge > download site?
This would enable the version tracking mechanism to work properly. > >I'll put this on my todo list. In any case you could help me to write a > >proper description that explains the differences to the users. The > >current packaging (under the name htqc - I did not yet updated to htqc2) > >contains the description you see here: > Is it possible to use the same description for HTQC 1 and 2? Because the > changes are subtle, and the major change is about programming API and program > functionality separation. Sure that is "possible" but descriptions are way to transport a message to your users to give them a helping hand to decide what program to use. In this sense I do not consider identical descriptions as the best idea. Since you did not suggested any change to the description here https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/htqc.git/tree/debian/control I assume you are happy with it, right? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
