+1 for libjung-free-java, yep! On Fri, Aug 21, 2015, 04:03 [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 08/21/2015 11:26 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:21:02AM +0000, olivier sallou wrote: > >> Hi, > >> to avoid dependency licensing issue of libjung (related to dependency > >> libjai-core-java), we could package libjung with the removal > >> of jung-jai-contrib-2.0.1-sources > >> and jung-jai-samples-contrib-2.0.1-sources from the build. > >> This would be a "partial" jung package but would contain most of libs > and > >> could be in free (with using libcolt-free-java instead of libcolt-java). > >> Removing those remove the jai build dependency. > >> We would only need to specify missing libs in description/README. > > Sounds good. To lean on the naming of libcolt I'd suggest to use the > > package name > > > > libjung-free-java > > I will wait for Michael news to coordinate > > > >> I made locally a quick build with this removal, and everything build > fine ( > >> for jung), and almost for trinity (get a strange error...) > >> > >> trinity does not make use of those contrib file. > > Cool, I'd say just go for it > > > > Andreas. > > > > > > -- > > gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) > > Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 > > -- Michael R. Crusoe: Programmer & Bioinformatician [email protected] The lab for Data Intensive Biology; University of California, Davis https://impactstory.org/MichaelRCrusoe http://twitter.com/biocrusoe
