-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi,
Am 22.08.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Tomasz Buchert: > I've pushed another change to libdivsufsort which, to my knowledge, > is "The Right Thing To Do". I still needed to apply a custom patch > for "include" directory because header files are generated > on-the-fly, but other than that it seems fine. Patch looks ok to me, but I am not an expert on these things. > I propose to ask upstream to use them. Definitely, once we have the patches ready, they should be bundled in a pull request. Then we should notify upstream via mail, because they don't seem to be an active GitHub user. With respect to bug #794729. I guess that is fixed now and can be closed. But since libdivsufsort-dev now depends on libdivsufsort3 should we also add the 3 to the -dev package: libdivsufsort3-dev? What is the usual debian way to handle that? Best, Fabian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV2FwWAAoJEA/ahZpWA3bBSDUQAJ/MAoaJGuoMUam/N811oiGY gI2pSPC6+ryMmwRpZI655iVsn3Vo4et23p/V45DfOshgfuaVdn29iWuDEplw23TC khef43sgdZzdJZc+NWlMws86o41ADWKyGWN5TWeOGI8tpy2Ermxus4INYu7SxQmb PnmtCYHLhT56MCjVMGFYZPunsFA7nLVmiTquuTU5WsNZLMa8c54DcqyeeSuT6PL3 zwpVzOr9P0+kch748/ZMRYQYgqN5EDJuG8lqFk7VuyfYUfCMY368kF5C34wiwZvQ ZwXYCY+OdKbPL4Jy3pNki1+Ic6fOCWTFPz9alIwMrhk9wLh+gaPKTdK8de7YPxYR Qoyueo8Qy2yQUr7nXf95Ie12HfHNckaWYt/TlbymzXm2aUD3QhOAt3WQ4tREYGUf UOWIVMedh65E0qJGL3FSwewVX+QyGJZSCglOXT534XAfHvenS6cPPFluXc9iWWuD mpX2rN2m6yDY3XwuzP6T0+c13HU0gpCMV5zYWBpTUEQpd6LlyVaenPiu+t1S1CqN TK6cLUS4tTLodFbZtktITrTENnNMdgll+hGkX2CjGpDGTVYyuADtKwe4AM0Bzv9i WpvOUz5Mc3ZU9pNjv311j4sLliLKYqRs2vneUk86O0rmpYq5Egm/NTwLt1ldlgUz 9T9lduRraFzP6Z/O1Mnd =FZdA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
