On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 07:25:03PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > Well, I'm a bit concerned about the proper upgrade path from these > packages. It seems this is not really defined, and since debsym > packages don't go into d/control, I also seems that there is no option > to define a virtual package -dbg to get this automatically.
Well, there is also none now.
Now people with libdcmtk5-dbg won't have libdcmtk8-dbg automatically
once their libdcmtk5 will be upgraded to libdcmtk8.
> On the other hand the -dbg popcorn count is very low (2), so maybe
> there is no real harm in dropping the -dbg package.
debug packages are meant for advanced users, that imho ought to be able
to find them. Starting with stretch there is a real canonical place
where to find them (the debug archive), which is imho nicer than the
verious -dbg.
Also consider that your libdcmtk5-dbg also contains debug symbols for
all the binaries in /usr/bin, not only the library itself, which is
really counter-intuitive given its package name.
> I'll ping you on the list when this is done.
Thanks.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
