Hi, Canberk and Andreas! 20.05.2016 11:29 пользователь "Andreas Tille" <[email protected]> написал: > > Hi Canberk, > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:04:08AM +0300, Canberk Koç wrote: > > Hello Andreas, > > > > I execute script succesfully and have a list at last thank you :-) I look > > them and consider i start with most voted to the last like this list . And > > i'll talk with Tanya to avoid confliction. > > Fine. This was the sense of the list. :-) > > > emboss | 753 | > > Please note that emboss is probably not a good thing to start with since > its quite complex. > > > pymol | 608 | > > rasmol | 319 | > > These both are maintained by the DebiChem team which is no reason to > stop us to enhance packages of cooperating teams but as far as I know > the packages need upstream upgrades as well which might cause problems. > Fixing those problems would be definitely very welcome (I think Tanya > announced that she wants to work on one of these). >
Yes :-) If you don't mind I would work on these two packages, or at least pymol > > clustalx | 162 | > > ncbi-tools6 | 154 | > > perlprimer | 144 | > > njplot | 141 | > > treeviewx | 109 | > > ncbi-blast+ | 81 | > > gbrowse | 80 | > > You might like to pick those from the list that you know to some extend > first. There is no point in sticking to the sequence strictly. > > > But first i complete exonerate package i remember it have some > > problems about test. > > Its fine if you intend to enhance it. I recently uploaded exonerate > with the existing test which at least is passing. > > > My finals will start 30 May also how many package i must complete in a > > week to complete my task succesfuly what do you think > > I admit that I have no realistic estimation for the number of packages > you can finally manage. There might be packages where it is very simple > and with some experience in working on this in the end of the project it > sounds possible to do one package per day if it are easy ones. But I do > not intend to make this a fixed number since I evaluate a well designed > test for an important package higher than just a simple tickmark behind > any package of the list. If I see that you are busy working on those > packages and we get a third of the whole list done that's fine - if we > manage more that's better. Defining "success" is also a long term goal. > I'd consider it success as well if you might keep on working inside the > team after the GSoC project has finished. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de Best wishes, Tanya
