Hello all, I think ı use the approach which fit situation .-) Thanks for your help really .
Best Regards Canberk Koç [image: https://]about.me/canberkkoc <https://about.me/canberkkoc?promo=email_sig&utm_source=email_sig&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=external_links> 2016-08-23 1:56 GMT+03:00 Sascha Steinbiss <[email protected]>: > Hi Andreas, > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 02:20:08PM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > >> BTW you don’t need to install your test data to be used in the > autopkgtest, as tests will always be run with an decompressed source tree > present, including the debian directory. > > > > I think I have influenced Canberk here with my habit to enable users > > using the autopkgtest as usage example at the same time. This requires > > to have the example data installed in a binary package as well as the > > script that is called by debci. > > Ah, I see — this makes sense, thanks. In cases such as this the example > set would need to be split up across multiple binary packages though — some > would need to go into blast2 and some into ncbi-tools-bin (or ncbi-data, > that would work as well…). > Anyway, I understand the motivation now and while I’m usually more of a > minimalist I completely respect that approach! > Canberk, please don’t let that keep you from including examples :) > > Cheers > Sascha >
