Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes: > Having some more testing in unstable before the freeze > might be something we should gain for.
Certainly, but the remaining changes I have planned for ncbi-tools6 are relatively formal, so testing what's already in unstable should be sufficient for most purposes. That said, I did try to take care of both packages tonight, but wound up only having time for ncbi-blast+; I plan to follow up with ncbi-tools6 tomorrow. (I also remain confident that it won't need to go through NEW, though ncbi-blast+ might.) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/[email protected]
