Hi again, On 22.09.17 16:54, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 04:00:52PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >>> I do not think that the effort is really moot since there is no code yet >>> (and nobody volunteered to code this - I for myself feel not really able >>> to since I'm lacking the biological background). So for the moment we >>> need to rely on manual editing. >> Agreed. >> >> Should we put the auto-transfer of other-than-bio task pages from the >> external catalogs on our agenda for the next Sprint? There should be >> APIs out there to use for us. > I do not understand the question: For sure anybody can put sensible > things on the agenda. There is no point for discussion here.
The question was if you would like an investment of effort in that direction. I was asking since we also reduce the amount of control we have over it all. ... > >> And you should then also add all the packages that are >> in bio-ngs but not in bio, I tend to think. > I'm not aware that there is anything in bio-ngs that is not in bio. I had a bit of fun on that one: ...blend-med/tasks$ for i in bio bio-ngs; do egrep -v "^[ \t]*[X#]" $i | sed -e 's/#.*$//' -e 's%//.*$%%' | grep -v '^\t'| egrep -v "^( |Homepage|Lice|Pkg|Resp|Comm|Why|Lang|Rem|Meta|Task|Desc|WNPP)"| tr " :,." "\n" | sort -u > $i.unique; done ...blend-med/tasks$ join -v 2 bio.unique bio-ngs.unique annovar <- non-free, was on wish list hinge scoary umap It is far fewer than I had anticipated. >> Also we may be happier by >> tagging packages within bio rather than maintaining multiple files. > That's the idea why we have this large bio task. I do not think that it > is the most practival task but at least we will not miss anything. Got it now. > >> Anyway ... let us get complete the references to catalog(ue)s in and >> then see how this goes. > BTW, I added the references to the UDD query that is used in the tasks > pages generation code. So one further step is done to put them on the > tasks pages. Unfortunately I was running (again) on a strange encoding > problem with the UDD on my developer machine (luckily not on the > production machine) which for the moment thwarts my attempt to finalise > the web page. :-( Big ":-)" on my side for every bit approaching some visibility of our catalog references. Best, Steffen
