On 11/14/2017 10:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > while migrating packages from SVN to Git I stumbled upon discosnp. > According to its homepage[1] it is superseded by DiscoSnp++. The later > seems to require gatb-core where packaging has started[2]. This means > that now two package upgrades would profit from getting gatb-core done. > > Assuming that we will manage to finalise gatb-core in the near future > (Olivier, you might like to talk to upstream regarding droping third > party code from the upstream source which would simplify the work for > Nadiya) what is 3rd party code included ? I can forward to upstream author.
> what would be a sensible course of action: Continuing the > packaging from discosnp and rename it to discosnp++ or would anybody > prefer to package discosnp++ from scratch by keeping the old code of > discosnp as reference for comparison? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > [1] http://colibread.inria.fr/software/discosnp/ > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2017/10/msg00025.html > -- Olivier Sallou Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE Tel: 02.99.84.71.95 gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
