Dear all,

this paper has now surfaced

Möller, Steffen; Prescott, Stuart W.; Wirzenius, Lars; Reinholdtsen,
Petter; Chapman, Brad; Prins, Pjotr; Soiland-Reyes, Stian; Klötzl,
Fabian; Bagnacani, Andrea; Kalaš, Matúš; Tille, Andreas; Crusoe, Michael
R. (2017): Robust cross-platform workflows: how technical and scientific
communities collaborate to develop, test and share best practices for
data analysis. Data Science and Engineering.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41019-017-0050-4

that I recall to have its roots in an idea exchange during a train ride
from Saint Malo (where we had the 2015 Debian Med Sprint) to Rennes. The
2016 Sprint in Lyngby brought some flesh to it all, an ELIXIR Hackathon
in Trondheim shaped it further, at this year's Sprint in Bucharest we
then decided to write this up. Additional authors were picked from
comments in threads on the Debian Devel and Debian Med mailing lists or
that reached us in person at the ECCB or ISMB conferences and the BOSC
and Codefest premeetings. An EU COST action (which is EU money to
support travel among peers with similar or complementary interests) came
up with that journal and publication costs for the Open Access
publication were kindly taken from us.

I tend to think that we arrived at something that is not too Debianish
and not too much loaded with Bioinformatics. Thanks to a couple of
gifted native speakers it is all very enjoyable to read, too. And we
should also thank all those above referenced activities and their
sponsor that repeatedly bring us together.

Strategically, I do not know what the paper will be good for. It
triggered a lot in me. For instance we have a dualism with the
Conda/BioConda communities that Debian needs to learn from, I tend to
think. Also, a thread on auto-built packages to bring closer to our
distribution I started here
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/11/msg00120.html which came
up while contributing to that paper. And we need more ideas to develop
ourselves to remain attractive to the periphery to our distribution.
Maybe we could have synchronised with Fink in a better way to attract
Mac people. Or newer virtualisation techniques that are not clouds but
mimic a Linux kernel on Windows (Windows Subsystem for Linux (newish) or
http://www.colinux.org/ (old, worked nicely!)) should be promoted more.

Something I will raise at the next Sprint is a request to think about a
Debian Med paper that we should then cite with whatever biological
research we perform with Debian Med (directly or containerised). To
decide how we should present ourselves in there could reflect/direct
what to show on a Debian Med booth on conferences.

Cheers,

Steffen

Reply via email to