it would be nice if you could add some clarifying comments to some
question marks I added to the list. Meanwhile I ITPed and uploaded the
missing R packages - at least those than can be packaged for licensing
reasons. If I do not hear from you I will soon remove those packages
from the list that are obvious false positives.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:10:14PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> thanks for the comparison.
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 07:21:20PM +0100, Tony Travis wrote:
> > Re: Our discussion at the 2018 Debian-Med Sprint in Barcelona.
> > I've compared our Bio-Linux 'master' package list used to create the
> > 'live/install' USB stick with your "med-bio*" list of 'Recommends:'.
> > Updated to remove ',' from the end of "med-bio*" package names and the
> > "bio-linux-" prefix from the Bio-Linux 'master' package list.
> I was working down your list and have pushed it into a newly created
> repository here:
> Non-biological software was striped of, packages only in Debian were
> also stripped. The diff contained several false positives which are
> marked by "??? in Debian" - may be Tony can clarify why he thinks
> these were marked missing.
> Real missings got helpful links and comments added. Please work
> down this todo list, package what is possible and add the repository
> containing your packaging effort.
> Everybody is welcome to add further remarks to the list - most
> preferably adding links to the repository where the packaging is
> started. So feel free to
> git clone g...@salsa.debian.org:med-team/community/bio-linux.git
> and help making Bio-Linux a real subset of Debian.
> Kind regards