Hi Sébastien,

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:32:28PM +0200, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> The Debian packages for Orthanc and its associated plugins pay attention to
> the fact of *not* setting "-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release", as requested by the
> Debian policy [1].
> 
> However, the source code of the upstream Orthanc project makes many calls to
> the "assert()" function of the standard library [2], in order to help with
> the early tracking of bugs. All those assertions are extremely
> time-consuming, and should only be enabled in debug builds.
> 
> The assertions can be disabled by defining the macro "NDEBUG" while
> compiling the software. Invoking CMake with "-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release"
> would make "NDEBUG" defined, at least for gcc and clang [3]. However,
> because packages of the Orthanc family are built using
> "-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None", the Orthanc log warns about bad performance:
> 
> 
> $ sudo apt-get install orthanc
> $ head /var/log/orthanc/Orthanc.log
> W0424 13:01:40.158634 main.cpp:1298] Orthanc version: 1.3.2
> W0424 13:01:40.158696 main.cpp:1146] Performance warning: Non-release build,
> runtime debug assertions are turned on
> 
> 
> I have not been able to find a definite answer about how "NDEBUG" should be
> properly handled. I am considering to add the following arguments wile
> invoking CMake in debian/rules in order to have "NDEBUG" manually defined:
> 
> cmake -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=-DNDEBUG -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-DNDEBUG [...]
> 
> Please someone could validate this approach? TIA!
> 
> Regards,
> Sébastien-
> 
> PS: I mistakenly sent this message yesterday to
> "[email protected]". Please excuse my error.

:-)
You are lucky - this list takes only signed mails from DDs. :-)

However, the best idea is to send this mail rather to
[email protected] (feel free to CC here) since your
chances to find some cmake experts are higher there (despite also
here are some lurking.

Sorry for not beeing more helpful myself

       Andreas.
 
 
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711515#51
> [2] http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cassert/assert/
> [3] https://stackoverflow.com/a/34314956/881731

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Reply via email to