Hi Andreas, On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 10:25, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Liubov and Elmar, > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:56:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Regarding libARB I've got an answer to my question[1] which was CCed > > to the list but did not arrived in the web archive. It boils down > > that libARB should be free: > > > > http://bugs.arb-home.de/browser/trunk/arb_PUBLIB_LICENSE.txt > > > > For you this means: Just wait until I managed to separate the free > > parts from the arb package. It's quite on top of my todo list. > > I was now able to build all dirs mentioned in arb_PUBLIB_LICENSE.txt > and pushed the result to > > https://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/libarb/ > > (for sure you can build your on your own from Git[2]) > > I heavily hacked upstream makefiles and its definitely no clean > solution but the result looks similar to what we have inside the > arb package. However, while the build of those directories that > are mentioned by upstream as freely licensed I get only > > libARBDB.so and > libCORE.so > > while the libarb package build from the arb source contains > > ARB.so , > libAWT.so and > libWINDOW.so > > in addition. Please check whether Sina might need these or if the > current build is OK. When I tried to build SINA with new libarb, I got: configure:16724: error: in `/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>': configure:16726: error: Required libraries found missing: ARB PROBE library (PROBE_COM/client.a) ARB HELIX library (SL/HELIX/HELIX.a) > If you confirm that this approach is sufficient > I'll contact upstream about a license of several files from other > directories which were needed to successfully build what we have now. > > Once we might get an official libarb package we should drop it > from the arb package and link arb against this. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > With regards, Liubov > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2019/04/msg00041.html > [2] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libarb > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > >
