Hello Andreas, Unfortunately, my past projects so far have been geared towards cryptography of various large datasets, socket based communications and other side arbitrary projects that have no linkage to the science scope of things, although I do agree that a personal project would have precedence in terms of knowledge and implementation.
Moreover, I have taken the time to request access on Gitlab (thank you for accepting this request) and also generate a 4096-bit gpg key which will of course be useful for future signing. In the meantime, I will do some more digging around to familiarise and settle with a package. Kind regards, Shayan Doust July 1, 2019 9:31 PM, "Andreas Tille" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Shayan, > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 03:20:36PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > >> Hello Andreas, >> >> Thanks for your reply. I have read the MoM wiki page, as well as any >> packaging references or guides >> I could find. I will also create wiki account; that is not an issue for me. >> >> I am a fairly experienced C(++) programmer and I understand the Linux >> philosophy and ecosystem. I >> have written some (fairly arbitrary and more upstream-dependent) programs >> but I have never packaged >> for any distribution. As more of a narrow-down, my interests are within >> terminal based (or console) >> applications rather than working with any GUI, but that's just down to my >> taste so any package >> should be ideal for me. It's a bit hard to think of any specific package or >> package genre/type that >> would be of interest, as my scope of interest is really wide. > > Thanks for this introduction. Is one of the programs you wrote yourself > covering the field of life sciences? Packaging the software you know > best is probably a very good idea. > >> I do apologise for possibly being vague here. > > No need to apologise. You are welcome with every question here. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de
