Hi Steffen, On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 07:58:56PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: > igblast is something I want to see added to our distribution. It seems > to compile, is also (almost) tests just fine. My concern is that there > is so much shipping with it that has nothing to with immunoglobulins: It > is alone 138 *.so files and 50 executables, of which only one is called > "igblast" which I am after. The other parts are redundant with the > blast package.
Hmmm, reduncancy is not really a good idea. > What should I do? Just take my binary of interest and leave the other > stuff out? Perhaps leaving out even the source makes sense. I stripped down the libucsc (blat) source heavily so that only remains what is really needed. It uncovers some restrictions in specifying regular expressions in Files-Excluded (which is not possible and not easy to implement). > This ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/blast/executables/igblast/release/1.15.0/ is > where I got the source tree. It is not the case that igblast also occurs > elsewhere, say together with the regular NCBI tools, and I am not aware > of it. What about asking upstream? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
