Hi, pyranges finally builds now with passing tests - however there are a few issues as lintian reports.
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.30-8) ... E: pyranges source: source-is-missing docs/libs/gitbook-2.6.7/js/app.min.js E: pyranges source: source-is-missing docs/libs/gitbook-2.6.7/js/lunr.js line length is 14839 characters (>512) E: pyranges source: source-is-missing docs/libs/jquery-2.2.3/jquery.min.js E: python3-pyranges: unknown-file-in-python-module-directory usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/hi I know what this is about - this is because this ships minified javascript - which is forbidden in debian. There are several such JS files vendored in the documentation. However - the documentation is vendored in two formats: 1. html files with corresponding JS 2. The exact same documentation is also vendored in .Rmd format - I've compared it and it is indeed, same. Now, coming to the problem:There are two ways to fix the errors: 1. The most ideal way will be to remove all the javascript files and symlink against system files. However, as you can see: there's a file named "app.min.js" : this is a pretty generic name with no obvious source. Hence, I need to ask upstream to provide that file and minify it during build - not sure how many weeks(or months this will take) 2. Simply remove the html + vendored JS. The documentation is anyway vendored in .Rmd files, and by doing this I'm not depriving the users from the documentation - I'm just reducing the functionality a little by removing html files. I admit that I'm honestly tempted to go with this option since this saves me from a lot of un-necessary work as well as waiting for upstream to give me the source of "app.min.js" - the docs are delivered anyway, albeit in different format - hence I do not see any side-effects of doing this. I need opinions and "ACKs" before I do anything. Please let me know what seems good to you. Kind Regards, Nilesh
