Hi Shayan, you asked about the packaging status of libsonlib since you need it for marginphase. I pushed something which somehow creates some binary package containing some header files and a static library.
It builds if you uncomment the building of libquicktree-dev[1] (or just checkout commit fe426a6598742190616d848b8a06773b570106f1) However, the libsonlib packaging is not yet "sensible" in the following ways: 1. There are installed some binaries under /usr/bin which seem to be tests only. While the build time test works the autopkgtest is just a pure boilerplate == non-functional. I think the way to finalise libsonlib would be to find out whether there are any sensible binaries in /usr/bin and leave these (if they are not just tests) and may be write some manpage (using help2man - no real effort to write it manually!) 2. Inside the autopkgtest reproduce compiling the test tools and run the tests. I stopped for the reason that my original target signalalign needs a further dependency: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-servicecourse This should be a proper Python Module but upstream has just thrown three files into the root dir of the archive. Possibly this can be fixed by some simple setup.py to profit from pybuild - but may be moving those files manually might be possible as well. I simply stoped here and since my final target signalalign seemed to complex I left sonlib as well since I was not sure whether the packaging finally works that way. If you have some other target that needs libsonlib it would make perfectly sense to continue that effort and check whether that target builds with the current libsonlib - if not fix it. ;-) Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/quicktree -- http://fam-tille.de
