Hi Steffen, On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:22:58PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > BTW, is it a *workflow* (thus kind of a user application)? If so the > > name python3-seqcluster is *wrong* and should be rather only seqcluster. > > We prefix package that provides a Python3 **module** with python3 and > > not any package that by chance was written in Python3. So please > > consider renaming the package (and the repository) to seqcluster if > > its not a module you include somewhere in some workflow but rather a > > self-standing application. > > I had thought about it. From what I have observed, bcbio used the python > API. > The package comes with a 300 bytes executable, so technically, yes, you can > execute something. > > I kind of liked that because of pip the seqcluster name is kind of > guaranteed to be unique in the python world. But seqcluster by itself, > this cries for a name conflict sooner or later, like seqlib is troubling > us these days. > > What might be nice is to have an additional binary that only includes > the executables, so we are likely to avoid someone coming up with a > seqcluster package in the near future.
OK, fine for me. Having a separate binary package with executables sounds pretty sensible to me. > >> I am happy to just have vienna-rna suggested instead of recommended, so > >> I wait for your comment on the non-free build-dep. > > Only if we can strip the test suite to not necessarily need vienna-rna. > > I personally rank the integrity from testing higher than having it in main. Fair enough. > > BTW, did you contacted vienna-rna upstream to free their code and if > > yes, please add this attempt to > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMed/SoftwareLiberation > > Yes. Will do. Great! > I was hoping to run into the guys at one of the upcoming conferences but > ... Winter is coming. > > I'll collect opinions for another while and eventually then upload. > > Many thanks! You are welcome Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
