Hi Andreas, I've looked at that package some months ago (no progress done).
At 'pbgenomicconsensus' d/changelog there is this TODO comment: "TODO: unanimity to get python3-consensuscore2" At 'unanimity' d/changelog there is also a TODO comment claiming build problems with latest 'libpbcopper' version. As 'unanimity' 3.3.0 is already uploaded, 'python3-consensuscore2' can be built. I think 'python3-consensuscore2' may be uploaded that way. 'pbgenomicconsensus' should build fine after uploading 'python3-consensuscore2'. Of course 'unanimity' will be outdated after both package uploads. Hope it helps. Let me know if I've misunderstood some steps here. Regards, On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > we are loosing step by step Pacific Biosciences software written in > Python2 (some packages are just removed). It would be great to know if > really anybody is using it and whether it would be sensible to put some > effort into it of whether removal is the most sensible action. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > ----- Forwarded message from Moritz Mühlenhoff <[email protected]> ----- > > Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 20:59:37 +0200 > From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Subject: Re: pbgenomicconsensus: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:30:23AM +0000, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: src:pbgenomicconsensus > > Version: 2.3.2-5 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: sid bullseye > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: py2removal > > > > Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove > > Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html > > Upstream development seems to have stalled, let's remove? > > Cheers, > Moritz > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > -- Antoni Villalonga https://friki.cat/
