Hi Andrei,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:20:11PM +0200, Andrei Rozanski wrote:
>
> > Its definitely OK. I do not think whether there is any "good practice" to
> > work around broken upstream Makefiles.
> > > > this will fail on all other build architectures than amd64 under Linux.
> > > > May be its sensible to replace it simply by
> > > >
> > > > sys.*/
> > > I will look into libsmithwaterman. Thanks!
>
> Unfortunately I cannot make it happen. I have been checking d-shlibmove,
> soname but I cannot put pieces together.
May be I was not clear enough. Please *ignore* d-shlibmove for the
moment. What we need first is a shared library since this is mandatory.
If you manage to tweak the build system in a way we can have *.so
**and** *.a then (and only then) we might consider d-shlibmove since it
requires both kind of libs.
I was pointing to libsmithwaterman for binary package names as well
as a potential way to create automake stuff in a patch (but that's
not required).
Sorry if I have dragged you into a to complex dead end street.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
