Hi On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 00:19, Steffen Möller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > So, our FTPmasters have rejected the update (!) of stringtie. > > On 01.11.20 13:00, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Hi Maintainer, > > > > sorry, going to reject the package this time. > > > > While the bloat here is not as large as some other package had, it > > still is bloat in the debian/ dir that does not really belong there. > > Those tests/data files ought to be much better placed in an own > > tarball, the archive can handle multi-tarball packages just fine. > > I do not have the time to read up about it. @Nilesh, do you have the > energy for that by chance? And then we should somehow all learn about this. > Yes, I just committed the multi-orig tarball solution sometime ago. Please take a look[1]. I _really_ need an ACK - if this is done correctly. > Additionally, your copyright file needs adjusting - the > > gclib/GBitVec.h file contains code taken forom LLVM, and that has a > > way different license than what you list currently. > > Ok, this seems like fixable. > By the looks of it, it is an exact code copy of libgclib. Should we nuke directory entirely and use the gclib from debian? [1]:https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/stringtie [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libgclib
