Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2020-11-12 17:44:58 +0100: > ../tests/src/test_ReadGroupInfo.cpp:280:9: required from here > /usr/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:1591:3: error: static assertion > failed: If you want to output boost::optional, include header > <boost/optional/optional_io.hpp> > 1591 | BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG(sizeof(CharType) == 0, "If you want to > output boost::optional, include header <boost/optional/optional_io.hpp>"); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From what I understood, the header needs to appear before the
first occurrence of #include <boost/optional.hpp>. In that case
however, after solving that first symptom, there are a few
occurrences of a "barcode" variable which have an undefined auto
type, and do not resolve as expected at build time, leading to:
../tests/src/test_ReadGroupInfo.cpp:287:9: required from here
/usr/include/boost/optional/optional_io.hpp:47:21: error: no match for
‘operator<<’ (operand types are ‘std::basic_ostream<char>’ and ‘const
std::pair<short unsigned int, short unsigned int>’)
47 | else out << ' ' << *v ;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/10/istream:39,
from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional_io.hpp:15,
[...]
I tried a thing or two based on this thread:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29665483/right-way-to-use-boostoptional#29665584
but I ended up doing targeted disablings of checks, as I had no
idea how to fix this properly. :(
The package now builds, I even ran autopkgtest, and nothing to
report there, things work. My C++ is not the best so if anyone
sees a much more appropriate fix for the boost::optional issue,
feel free to bring changes here:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pbbam
> Thanks for your always helping hands
You're welcome, glad to be of help. :)
--
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/7, please excuse my verbosity.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
