> Yes, it's now closer to a real X ray. The Dr still sees some problems, but > I think it will need some experiments with exposure, brightness and > contrast.
Typically, there's presets for those but as a doctor one always plays with them such settings during the diagnostics process. So, I suppose finding suitable defaults is useful but then one should strive to convert the data to a more conventional format, say, some DICOM variant and feed that to Orthanc for storage and to Ginkgo CADx / Aeskulap / your-favourite-viewer for image display. They offer controls for adjusting exposure, brightness, and contrast. I can ascertain one _needs_ to adjust those dynamically :-) Karsten
