On 10 October 2022 11:50:14 am IST, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: >> If no one gets to it, asking for removal is a sensible option. It otherwise >> imho becomes another time sapping package that no one cares about much. > >There was no volunteer to pick up the gcc-12 port of this package. So >it seems to be time to ask for removal, right? Yep! -- Best, Nilesh
- [Help] anfo: ftbfs with GCC-12 Andreas Tille
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with GCC-12 Aaron M. Ucko
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with GCC-12 Andreas Tille
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with GCC-12 Étienne Mollier
- Re: Bug#1012893: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with... Andreas Tille
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with GCC-12 Aaron M. Ucko
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with GCC-12 Andreas Tille
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with GCC... Nilesh Patra
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with... Andreas Tille
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with... Nilesh Patra
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with... Steffen Moeller
- Re: [Help] anfo: ftbfs with... Andreas Tille

