Hi, I never managed to finish raxml-ng packaging which would be a great thing to have. Some hints about its preconditions can be found inn the issue linked below.
Kind regards Andreas. ----- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von Alexey Kozlov <[email protected]> ----- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:17:07 -0700 From: Alexey Kozlov <[email protected]> To: amkozlov/raxml-ng <[email protected]> Cc: Andreas Tille <[email protected]>, Author <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [amkozlov/raxml-ng] What libpll code is really needed (Issue #164) > If I simply would package libpll-2 in the very place where libpll was > packaged and I keep *that* name (without the -2) this would be pretty > convenient since its not a new Debian package and does not need any new > processing. Do you think this is the correct way to go? Yes, I think this is the way to go. In fact, in the next major raxml-ng release, both `libpll-2` and `pll-modules` will be superseded by the new lib `coraxlib`: https://codeberg.org/Exelixis-Lab/coraxlib This should hopefully solve the long-lasting historical name confusion. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/amkozlov/raxml-ng/issues/164#issuecomment-1684443628 You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Message ID: <amkozlov/raxml-ng/issues/164/[email protected]> ----- Ende weitergeleitete Nachricht ----- -- https://fam-tille.de
