Hey all,
https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team/reviews/-/issues/11 harbors the request to check what I have come up with for the ihm Python module. Many thanks, Steffen > Gesendet: Montag, 21. Juli 2025 um 17:14 > Von: "Steffen Möller" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Betreff: Aw: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and > python-modelcif packages > > > Hi Charles, > > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2025 um 14:59 > > Von: "Charles Plessy" <[email protected]> > > An: "Steffen Möller" <[email protected]> > > CC: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and > > python-modelcif packages > > > > Le Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 12:50:06PM +0000, Steffen Möller a écrit : > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ihm > > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-modelcif > > > > > > In my humble opinion those packages are reasonably fine to upload - maybe > > > after the release, but technically fine. I would appreciate a peer review > > > in case I have messed something up. And please feel free sponsoring the > > > package if sufficiently happy. > > > > > please allow me to advertise https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team ! > > First time I ever heard about it. Looks interesting, will do! > > > Also, I wonder if these packages would be more suitable for the python > > team, if > > their maintainance benefits more from Python knowledge than bioinformatics > > knowledge? > > I was tempted to upload to Debian Science, but the Python team I recall to > have outsourced the maintenance of several sciency-Python packages before. > The driving motivation for me to address their packaging is the aforeITPed > boltz software (an alphafold-substitute), so I think it is fine. We can still > move it another day once that more reverse dependencies are surfacing in > Debian. > > Best, > Steffen > >
