Hi Manik, Manik Bhattacharjee, on 2026-01-21: > with Emmanuel we checked the package that was accepted in experimental and > everything works correctly. > > During the test we detected a small UI issue and I added a patch to fix it. > I pushed to salsa with a new changelog to ask for inclusion into unstable, I > hope this is the right way to do it. > > As no package depends on CamiTK, there is no risk that our packages would > break another one.
Thanks for your work on camitk, experimental pseudo-excuses[1] raised no problems during quality assessment. I am running a build of your work and believe it will be suitable for upload, unless we missed something. [1]: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=camitk > The way we tested the experimental package is the following: > > [trimmed implementation details] > > This was necessary because otherwise, installing camitk-imp from > experimental (6.0.0) would pull libqtpropertybrowser-dev (5.2.0) from > unstable instead of 6.0.0 from experimental. > > Once we installed camitk-imp we were able to run and test it. Acknowledged, I believe another option that would work too, would be to use aptitude's dependency resolver. I found myself to use it regularly when dealing with dependencies pulled from experimental, while the default apt-get wouldn't pull the experimental version without a lot of hinting. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: Genesis - Ripples
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
