Hi Mathieu,

Mathieu Malaterre, on 2026-02-17:
> Le lun. 16 févr. 2026 à 22:30, Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > Greetings,
> >
> > In #1127756, Adrian Bunk spotted a build failure of dcmtk on
> > s390x.  I have spent a bit of time trying to check whether
> > addressing the issue was manageable.  After determining I would
> > get nowhere, I have contacted upstream via their contact mail
> > address dedicated to bug report ; see their CONTRIBUTING.md
> > file.  If the calendar plays well, dcmtk 3.7.0 may be sprint
> > material for the upcoming weekend.  If not, well, at least I
> > woule have tried.
> 
> I am pretty sure this is just a false positive. The code base of DCMTK
> is compatible with big-endian. I suspect you'll get an answer from the
> team real time soon. In case they are busy I suggest you go ahead with
> the experimental upload with the test disabled.

Thanks for your thoughts, although the feedback I got sounded
like there was indeed a problem in produced data (as opposed to
expected data I believe).  From DCMTK Team, on 2026-02-17:

> > > In this case, the pixel data of the dataset produced in the failing unit
> > > test indeed contains incorrect pixel data with incorrect byte order.

But I agree it is time to move forwards with the migration to
version 3.7.0 and this issue should probably not be a blocker
for a Debian experimental upload at least.  I triggered a last
s390x test build to make sure that my skip implementation goes
through and will upload at some point tomorrow evening.

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity
   `-    on air: Beethoven - Sonate pour piano n°8

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to