Stefan Alfredsson writes:

[Jeopardectomy]

> Quoting Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 
> > see any gpg options to mh, and if I include my scanned identification as
> > an attachment, then it will not count as input to the hash of the message.  

> This might be somewhat inconvenient, but how about including MD5 sums
> of the attachments in the body of the message, which is then signed?
> (i.e. md5sums *.jpg  + cutnpaste)

I made a sig separately and attached that. 'man gpg'...

; gpg --detach-sign --armor decklin-foster-id.jpg

-- 
There is no TRUTH. There is no REALITY. There is no CONSISTENCY. There
are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. I'm very probably wrong. -- BSD fortune(6)


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to