Yves Arrouye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I want to package something based on date (development snapshot) but
>w/o epochs (as I'm not sure where to start the epoch and how to drop it
>later).
You can never drop an epoch. Once you've introduced one, you have to
keep it or a higher epoch for the lifetime of that package name.
>If that works, why are the KDE packages using an epoch (4) instead of
>just 2.0-DATE-DEBIANRELEASE?
I guess there was some numbering problem at some point in the past.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
