Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > apt-get source byacc > and you have the old .tar.gz. (Or is there a good reason for a newly > compressed tarball?) The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was that I use cvs-buildpackage to make builds easier; if I have to futz about copying the old .tar.gz into place it could be a little inconvenient, but it's much better than not being able to upload it at all. Thanks, jason -- ``Banks *are* bastards.'' -- John Laws -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- different sizes for same upstream tarball Jason Henry Parker
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball Bradley Bell
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball Adrian Bunk
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball Jason Henry Parker
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball Goswin Brederlow
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball tony mancill
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarb... Goswin Brederlow
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarb... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball Hamish Moffatt
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarb... Josip Rodin
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball Jason Henry Parker
- Re: different sizes for same upstream tarb... Hamish Moffatt

