On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:16:16PM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> > samth# lintian --version
> > Lintian v1.20.6
> > samth# lintian -i uf-view_1.2-2_i386.changes
> > W: uf-view source: newer-standards-version 3.5.2.0
> >
> > I presume this is a lintian bug. Right?
> No, this is because your standards version is 3.5.0, and the current
> version is 3.5.2
>
Actually, my standards version is 3.5.2.0. And the lintian
explanation for this is:
N: The source package refers to a `Standards-Version' which is newer than
N: the one lintian is programmed to check. If the source package is
N: correct, then please upgrade lintian to the newest version. (If there
N: is no newer lintian version, then please bug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
N: to make one.)
So I think it is a lintian bug.
> Another thing: you should use a newer debian/rules file. There is a new
> target 'configure' which you can use to call ./configure.
> When doing this, look out if you have to depend on debhelper >= 3.0.
>
What's the advantage to using this? I couldn't find any references in
the debhelper docs or in policy to it. Would this be different that
having a private configure target for the internal use of the build
system?
> Yet another thing: your Build-depends seems wrong.
> Policy says: 'A source package may declare a dependency or a conflict
> on a binary package', but your are depending on a source package
> (libghttp), not the binary package (libghttp1). Ah, no, it should be
> libghttp-dev, the header package.
Doh. Fixed.
> Hmm, the configure file should also check for ghttp.h, it didnt complain
> when I run it without having ghttp.h, but compiling fails:
> [...]
> gladesig.c:6: ghttp.h: No such file or directory
Fixed.
New package at the same location,
deb[-src] http://samth.dyndns.org/debian ./
Thanks for your help
sam th
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
GnuPG Key:
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key
PGP signature
