On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 06:36:40AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > With the changelog entry? Make one for potato and one for woody. the potato > version get something with potao in the version number, the woody get a > higher version number, without potato. Happens all the time, look in > potato-proposed-upgrades. Ah yes, of course, that may be the solution. Just do something tricky with the version numbering. I'll try this when I get back home. Thanks, Peter. -- Peter van Rossum, Department of Mathematics, University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Phone: +31-24-3652997, E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- building binary-only package with different name? Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Julian Gilbey
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Brian Russo
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only package with diffe... Steve Langasek
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Christian T. Steigies
- Re: building binary-only package with diffe... Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Ove Kaaven
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Peter van Rossum
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Peter S Galbraith
- Re: building binary-only package with different... Steve Langasek
- Re: building binary-only package with diffe... Peter S Galbraith

