Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do I need to install non-free software if I want to sign packages on > potato? Neither gpg (with or without RSA) nor the RSA module are non-DFSG, today, even if one is still sitting in non-free. Anyway, unless your key is RSA, you don't need the module for signing. Maybe removing a stray "load-extension rsa" is enough? > Since there is no /usr/lib/gnupg/rsa in unstable, would > backporting the unstable gnupg to potato solve this? Yes, sid's gnupg includes RSA. -- Robbe
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has been built ... Peter S Galbraith
- How to locally sign a package that has been built... Marc Haber
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has be... Dennis Schoen
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has been b... Marc Haber
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has been b... Julian Gilbey
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has been b... Filip Van Raemdonck
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has been b... Marc Haber
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has be... Julian Gilbey
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has been b... Robert Bihlmeyer
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has be... James Troup
- Re: How to locally sign a package that has be... Marc Haber
signature.ng
