Re: USA crypto rules and libssl-dependent packages

[Manoj Srivastava]

>>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 Jimmy> Why is it not sufficient to do something like the following
 Jimmy> pseudo-code in debian/rules:

        [Delete hack with amke/cp/sed/make/cp back]

        Would it not be simpler just to use 

        $(MAKE) -f Makefile.with.ssl 
        $(MAKE) -f Makefile.without

        See, no sed, no copying back and forth, and one can build with
 or without ssl packages independently.

        manoj
-- 
 I'm ZIPPY the PINHEAD and I'm totally committed to the festive mode.
Manoj Srivastava   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]