>>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
Jimmy> showed ID that had the name "James Kaplowitz", which is my
Jimmy> legal name. On my key, I had the name I go by in everyday
Jimmy> life, which is "Jimmy Kaplowitz". This wasn't a problem for
Jimmy> the Debian developer who signed my key. Would you have a
Jimmy> problem with common nicknames such as Jimmy, or would you need
Jimmy> to see documentation that Jimmy and James were the same
Jimmy> person? If you would need the documentation, what sort
Jimmy> of thing would you want to see?
Jimmy/James are acceptable social contractions/tranforms. I'd
not have any issues with that either. But if you try to say that
James Kaplowitz owns an ID [EMAIL PROTECTED], well, I
would have a slight problem with that.
manoj
--
Wake up and smell the coffee. Ann Landers
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
