On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:46:19 -0500 christophe barb� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:48:57PM +0100, J�r�me Marant wrote: > > > The current gphoto2 release is 2.0beta5 wich is packaged as 2.0beta5. > > > For the final release 2.0, I will package it as 2.0final. > > > > > > What would be the best numbering scheme for the next beta series to > > > avoid the use of final for the stable release ? why don't you do 2.0beta2 then -> 1:2.0 ? I think it is quite consistent [~] [kov]@[couve] $ dpkg --compare-versions "2.0beta2" lt "1:2.0" ; echo $? 0 []s! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://www.metainfo.org/kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
