On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > on all archs having the compiler and fail on others. This should not > prevent the package from going into testing or stable as long as no > previous package exists for one of the failing archs.
Ok, but is this a supposed "clean" way to go, or it is only a side-effect of the testing script on which is better not to rely? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
msg07144/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
