Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jon Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I would like to adopt the gnat package. > > What about gnat-doc? There are a number of problems with it (non-free > license, wrong copyright information in general, the RM should be > separate).
What about ACT not fixing bugs in the GNAT public releases? What about them not caring at all for bugs reported in the BTS and not sending any patch? The next GNAT maintainer must be warned that ACT does not cooperate very nicely with the community and it is still the case of the GNAT in the GCC tree. (Prove me wrong) Cheers, -- J�r�me Marant http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
