Joe Nahmias wrote: > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request > For Sponsorship? > Comments? AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also include ITA and possibly RF-yet-another-S for packages already in the archive in case a previous sponsor lacks time or similar. Also, your assuming that DDs intending to package are willing to sponsor.
Cheers Thomas In fact, it's the other way round.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
