Hi
I imagine a simple suggests with a note on the README pointing to the
documentation on doc-linux-{html,text} would be fine.
I don't think using the extra space for duplicate documentation is a
good idea, but maybe there's a more gentle solution...PS.:(pt_BR) eu me sinto um idiota escrevendo ingl�s pra gente do Brasil... mas tudo bem... On Seg, 2003-07-07 at 07:22, Michelle Ribeiro wrote: > Hello, all. > > My package upstream's have a doc, about the package installation and configuration > at LDP. So, this doc is also in the doc-linux-html package. > > Should I release the doc html and txt version with my package? > Make doc-linux-html a dependency doesn't seems good to me due the size. > > Best cheers, > > -- > -- > Michelle Ribeiro -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key Fingerprint: 8AE6 CDFF 6535 192F B5B6 5921 2262 D36F 7ADF 9466 "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
