Ok, nearly there... thanks for the help, still struggling on one thing, here is the term log but basically the deb sig doesn't match the other two and i'm not sure why. i even tried replacing it:
[10:18:21 main]$ debsigs -sign=origin -default-key="Herb Gilliland (fed author) <[email protected]>" fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <[email protected]>" 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05 [10:07:10 main]$ debsign fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes -k"Herb Gilliland (fed author) <[email protected]>" signfile fed_0.94a-1.dsc Herb Gilliland (fed author) < [email protected]> You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <[email protected]>" 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05 signfile fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes Herb Gilliland (fed author) < [email protected]> You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <[email protected]>" 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05 Successfully signed dsc and changes files [~/temp] debsigs --list fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb GPG signatures in fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb: origin: signed by AA74DF0CDE8473B0 on Mon Apr 4 23:21:48 2016 *** NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO VERIFY THE LISTED SIGNATURES *** [~/temp] [10:09:13 main]$ debsig-verify fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb debsig: Could not open Origin dir /etc/debsig/policies/AA74DF0CDE8473B0: No such file or directory [~/temp] [10:09:24 main]$ debsigs --delete=origin fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb [10:18:21 main]$ debsigs -sign=origin -default-key="Herb Gilliland (fed author) <[email protected]>" fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <[email protected]>" 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05 [~/temp] [10:20:54 main]$ ls fed fed_0.94a-1.debian.tar.gz fed_0.94a-1.dsc fed_0.94a-1_i386.build fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb fed_0.94a.orig.tar.gz [~/temp] [10:20:56 main]$ dput mentors fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes Checking signature on .changes gpg: Signature made Tue Apr 5 10:07:24 2016 EDT using RSA key ID DE8473B0 gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author) < [email protected]>" Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes. Checking signature on .dsc gpg: Signature made Tue Apr 5 10:07:20 2016 EDT using RSA key ID DE8473B0 gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author) < [email protected]>" Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1.dsc. Checksum doesn't match for /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb 10:21:01 main]$ debsigs --list fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb GPG signatures in fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb: origin: signed by AA74DF0CDE8473B0 on Tue Apr 5 10:20:51 2016 *** NO ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO VERIFY THE LISTED SIGNATURES *** not sure what to do next.. On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >Having trouble doing the signing. I was able to sign the .deb but not > the .changes, any hints? I couldn't rectify the situation online yet > > > debsign filename_version.changes > > maybe you have to export your key on ~/.devscripts. > > e.g. for my key > > DEBSIGN_KEYID='92978A6E195E4921825F7FF0F34F09744E9F5DD9' > > > cheers, > > G. > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Herbert > > > >if you want to maintain the package in Debian it would be easier to find > a sponsor. > > > > > >you might want to start from there > >https://wiki.debian.org/IntroDebianPackaging > > > >you will probably need to check lintian and check-all-the-things to first > review your packaging. > > > >after that, please upload to mentors.debian.net and open an RFS bug > > > >cheers, > > > >G. > > > > > > > >Il Sabato 19 Marzo 2016 21:11, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > > >Hi Debian Mentors, > > > >I am a long-time user of nano - in fact it replaced my use of pico - but > in 2011 after I made a request to the nano people and that was > categorically denied, I decided to make an editor for linux using ncurses > that was a little more modern and similar to editors found on desktop PCs > like Windows and Mac. That's how fed (fedit) started. > > > >It has the feel of nano combined with feel of, say, Notepad++ or > KomodoEdit. > > > >Anyway, I was within 3 or 4 features of what I would call a version 1.0, > when I hit a roadblock trying to get it into a distro and decided to give > up for a while. Looking back at all of the features I packed into it, I > know it deserves a home among the other terminal editors like emacs, vi, > nano et al. It's really _different_ than those editors, and should be able > to stand on its own. The problem is, not many people know about it or have > it as a part of their linux experience. > > > >I've been using Debian since 1991 and I really would love it to be a part > of the apt-get package downloading system, officially supported! I have > some time to devote to this, but not a ton, but I want to persevere so I > can apt-get nano and also apt-get fed > > > >I'm willing to change to license it however it must be, I just really > want people to experience some of the awesome features of fed > > > >fed incorporates some of the greatest features of an ncurses editor, but > also in a familiar way regarding keystroes, and it has a 'perfect amount of > features' rather than an absolute ton as its core offering. It can be > extended through short scripts using a plugin interface, in virtually any > scripting language, but especially PHP, python, perl, shell scripts (so > anything really). > > > >A video (which covers pretty much EVERYTHING AWESOME about fed and its > prepackaged PHP plugins) is here: > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsc_NzxK67k > > > > > >And the source is here, if anyone wants to try it out on their box: > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/fed > > > > > >I'd love to find a sponsor and have fed just an apt-get away on any > Debian distro (Ubuntu etc) .. at least, that's what i'm trying to > accomplish. > > > >TIA > >-h3rb > > >
