On 5 April 2016 at 13:52, Gianfranco Costamagna <[email protected]> wrote: > so, please remove the moreinfo tag once you have a feedback from -boot team.
Will do. 'hope they rsvp soon! > also a reverse-dependency needs fixing here > https://codesearch.debian.net/results/btrfs-tools-udeb/page_0 > partman-btrfs Fixed. I can't believe I didn't think to check reverse dependencies when renaming a package...failure of common sense... Do I need to file a separate RFS for partman-btrfs, for an upload to experimental when it's work associated with this bug? http://mentors.debian.net/package/partman-btrfs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/partman-btrfs/partman-btrfs_20+nmu1.dsc > in the meanwhile you should consider fixing lintian complaints > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1/lintian btrfs-progs source: dbg-package-missing-depends btrfs-tools-dbg * because btrfs-tools-dbg depends on btrfs-progs-dbg which depends on btrfs-progs (= N: ${binary:Version}), the dependencies are already satisfied, no? Or is lintian not following the dependency tree to a sufficient depth? btrfs-progs source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature * I can't find a gpg signature, but there is a sha256sum < https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/kdave/btrfs-progs/sha256sums.asc > btrfs-progs: malformed-override Possibly wrong package in override at line 3 (got btrfs-tools, expected btrfs-progs) * fixed btrfs-progs: spelling-error-in-binaries and manpages * I'm sure I read on the btrfs mailing list that these were fixed in a later version. Of course, I'm willing to patch 4.4.1 if necessary. btrfs-progs: hardening-no-pie bin/btrfs Severity: normal, Certainty: wild-guess * I'm not sure about this one, but I given how often it is said on the vger mailing list that btrfs is young and is changing quickly, but I suspect that it's not yet time for this. What do you think? btrfs-progs: no-upstream-changelog * Maintained on the upstream btrfs wiki rather than a text file. btrfs-progs: command-with-path-in-maintainer-script postinst:7 /usr/sbin/update-initramfs * fixed. btrfs-progs: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbtrfs.so.0.1 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbtrfs.so *** I think this needs an override, please confim. *** btrfs-progs: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbtrfs.so.0.1 * Is this worthwhile when only partman-btrfs depends on this? Oh, and I found out why I used an old standards version in an earlier package...I'm still developing on Jessie and then using cowbuilder to build sid packages. Yeah, a proper development environment (perhaps a VM?) is needed and will soon be installed. If you have any suggestions, or know of any articles, please share! The updated btrfs-progs is in the same location on mentors. I didn't bump the NMU revision because it seems that my last package isn't in the archive anymore. Cheers, Nicholas
