Hi Gianfranco, Paul, thank you for assisting me.
I put the binary in a separated package.
Concerning the symbol file, it should be much better (after some study,
I realize, it wasn't clean at all :) )
I use now dh --with pkgkde_symbolshelper and this enables to use a oneliner such
as :
(subst)_Z30SPHLockFreeHeapNearAllocNoLockPv{size_t}@Base 1.1.0
It adds one Build-Depends. I can make use of arch-bits, let me know what you
think is recommended.
Btw the (c++) tag would be nice to use with very readable function names, but it
seems it has no support for {size_t} and on the other side pkgkde_symbolshelper
seems not to have support for (c++), or I missed something.
Fred
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:03:24 +0000 (UTC), Gianfranco Costamagna
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> >> BTW one single symbol file please>I recommend using the C++ support in
> >> dpkg-gensymbols to achieve this,
> >it is better than restricting particular symbols to particular arches
> >etc.
>
> this has to be read as:
>
> "one single symbol file that covers every architectures please"
>
> anyway, please convert them in c++ symbols.
>
> thanks
>
> G.
>
