Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2016 19:38:57 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#823470: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme
to Phoneme conversion tool
has caused the Debian Bug report #823470,
regarding RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion
tool
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
823470: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear all,
I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "sequitur-g2p"
* Package name : sequitur-g2p
Version : 0.0.r1668.r3-1
Upstream Author : Maximilian Bisani <[email protected]>
* URL :
http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/web/Software/g2p.html
* License : GPL-2
Section : science
It builds those binary packages:
sequitur-g2p - Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool
You can download the package with git using this command:
git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git
More information about sequitur-g2p can be obtained from
http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/web/Software/g2p.html.
A package review is very welcome as well.
Regards,
Giulio
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2016-05-06 01:27, Giulio Paci wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 19:07, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> In this particular case, I'd actually suggest that you stick to your
>> previous approach, and just modify it slightly:
>>
>> g2p-r1668.tar.gz => 0+r1668
>> g2p-r1668-r3.tar.gz => 0+r1668.r3 (or even just keep -r3!)
>
> I decided to follow the suggestion from
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/first.en.html#idp39551808 :
>
> "You should choose the upstream version to consist only of alphanumerics
> (0-9A-Za-z), plus (+), tildes (~), and periods (.). It must start with a
> digit (0-9)."
And rightly so. My comment was phrased poorly -- what I meant to say was
that keeping it verbatim would technically have been legal, according to
Policy ยง 5.6.12. It's certainly less confusing when one avoids hyphens,
though.
Anyhoo, I just uploaded it :-)
Regards,
Christian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
