On 05/08/2016 11:55 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:40:02PM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: >> James Cowgill: >>> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: >>>> gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg packages: >>>> >>>> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gearmand >>> >>> It's not migrating because the old dbg packages are still in sid. >> >> The note from testing.pl is (now) just an informational message. Have a >> look at [1], which notes the following items of interest: > > In general, testing.pl is imho more confusing than anything else. And > really reading the message in tracker.d.o is usually more than enough to > understand what's wrong. Not in this case, but here testing.pl didn't > either... > >>> Usually stuff like this is removed automatically by dak's auto >>> decrufter but apparently not this time. >>> >> >> Hmm, apparently the auto-decrufter thinks that the removal of >> libgearman7-dbg would break libgearman-dbg. I suspect part of the issue >> is that libgearman-dbg is an arch:all package (which has a different >> heuristic for depending when it should be decrufted). >> >>> If you file a NBS removal bug against ftp.debian.org then the package >>> should migrate after the dbg packages are removed manually. >>> >>> James >>> >> >> I agree that it would probably help. :) > > I agree that a NBS removal for libgearman-dbg should be enough. > Then the autodecrufter will be able to remove libgearman7-dbg, and then > gearmand will be able to migrate. >
Thank you for the details, I am preparing a new upload fixing a couple of minor issues and will file the NBS removal bug. Best regards, Alex
